espritdecorps

canadian military magazine
  • Home
  • About
    • History
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Scott Taylor
  • Store
    • Digital Issues
    • Subscribe
    • Books
  • Advertise
  • Bulletin Board
    • Industry
  • Content
    • History
    • World War One
    • Perspectives
    • Eye On Industry
    • Commentary
    • From Sky to Space
    • Canadian Army
    • The Armchair Colonel
  • Marketplace
  • Home
    • History
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Scott Taylor
    • Digital Issues
    • Subscribe
    • Books
  • Advertise
    • Industry
    • History
    • World War One
    • Perspectives
    • Eye On Industry
    • Commentary
    • From Sky to Space
    • Canadian Army
    • The Armchair Colonel
  • Marketplace

ON TARGET: WHOS IN WHOS FACE

  • On Target: Adding Fuel To The Fire
  • ON TARGET: WHO ARE THE "GOOD GUYS" IN MOSUL BATTLE
  • ON TARGET: Second Libyan intervention may be needed
  • ON TARGET: We Failed in Afghanistan
  • ON TARGET: It’s impossible to wage war against a tactic
  • ON TARGET: Genocide declaration gets Tories fired up
  • ON TARGET: Remembering Vimy Ridge
  • ON TARGET: War on terror isn’t our soldiers’ strong point
  • ON TARGET: Let's Start With the Basics
  • ON TARGET: LET'S JUMP BEFORE WERE PUSHED
  • On Target: A new face with a new perspective in the Minister's Office
  • On Target: Western Wartime Hipocrisy
  • On Target: Let's call it combat
  • On Target: Preserving the distinction of national mourning
  • ON TARGET: IRAQ CONFLICT SET TO BLOW
  • On Target: Defeating Daesh Could Make Matters Worse
  • On Target: Defeating Daesh is the easy part
  • ON TARGET: NO NEED TO BE TERRIFIED
  • On target: Canada celebrated a sh*t show
  • On Target: Does canada really need a mission in Africa
  • ON TARGET: TRUMP TARGETS NATO
  • On Target: Unpolishing a Turd
  • ON TARGET: HOW DUMB CAN WE BE?
  • ON TARGET: TANGLED ROAD TO IRAQ AND BACK
  • ON TARGET: KEEP CANADIAN UNIFORMS CANADIAN
  • ON TARGET: Time to take Trump seriously
  • ON TARGET: CANADA SHOULD STEER CLEAR OF PACIFIC SHOWDOWN
  • On Target: Ukrainian situation slipping under radar in West.
  • On Target: CF-18 withdrawal no great loss to allies in Syria
  • ON TARGET: WHOS IN WHOS FACE
  • On Target: Middle East mission now a Liberal delusion
  • On Target: It's all in the wording
  • On Target: Liberals dithering on Iraq and Syria file
  • On Target: The mess we made in Libya gave power to AQIM
  • On target: Our culture is not under assault
  • On Target: Bombing more and forever more is obviously not the answer
  • On Target: Fraser admits West failed Afghanistan
  • On Target: New Years Resolution: Let's admit our failures, and learn from them
  • On Target: Killing Afghans to save Afghans
  • ON TARGET: CANADA IN IRAQ- A COMPLEX EQUATION
  • On Target: Terrorism a desperate tactic not promoted by religion
  • On Target: What does victory in Iraq and Syria even look like?
  • On Target: Who's getting away with murder?
  • On Target: Fighting “against” Daesh does not explain what or who we are fighting “for”
  • On Target: France intensifying air attacks against ISIS an act of defiant resolve, not a solution
  • On Target: Assad is still a bad guy, but he is not the worst guy
  • On target Ukrainian conflict about more than good vs evil
  • On Target: It's about time Canada ends bombing mission against ISIS
  • On Target: As election dust settles, new PM may need to revise stance on F-35 plan
  • ON TARGET: WHY IS CANADA LOOKING FOR A WAR?
  • ON TARGET US hypocrisy soaring to new levels
  • ON TARGET: Taliban fighter seize control of Kuduz
  • On Target: Syrian Crisis Makes for Strange Bedfellows Indeed
  • On Target: War on ISIS makes for strange bedfellows
  • On Target: Let's Not Make The Same Mistake
  • On target tories rack up challenges to logic
  • On Target - August 4 2015
  • On Target We Must Take Some Of Blame For Refugee Crisis

ON TARGET: WHO'S IN WHO'S FACE

Social Media Manager May 24, 2016

By Scott Taylor

A number of recent international headlines had the warmongering tone and pubescent maturity of the old The Hotspur comic books: NATO and Russia preparing for conflict, warns report or U.S. and NATO move to secure Europe’s eastern flank as Russia buzzes destroyer.

Such taglines would leave one with the definite impression that the Russian horde is on the brink of attacking the free world. According to retired British Gen. Sir Alexander Richard Shirreff, war between the West and Russia is not only inevitable, he predicts it will begin with a Russian invasion of Latvia in May 2017. This should resonate among Canadians because just this past April, we had 40 soldiers conducting training exercises in Latvia as part of NATO’s Operation Reassurance. This means it is conceivable, should Shirreff’s prediction pan out, that Canada’s sons and daughters would be stationed at ground zero in Latvia when the third world war erupts next year.

Operation Reassurance began in April 2014 as part of NATO’s pre-emptive reaction to Russia’s annexation of the Crimea in March 2014. As a participant, Canada has been deploying troops to Central and Eastern European NATO countries on a continuous, albeit rotational, basis.

The problem with the anti-Russian rhetoric is that it paints Russia as a power-mad military aggressor. The reality is that NATO is staging major military exercises that involve tens of thousands of troops along Russia’s borders in the Baltic States. Yes, Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania are now all members of NATO, so one could argue this is within the prerogative of the alliance.

However, the U.S. and Britain are also conducting large-scale military exercises in the Republic of Georgia in the Caucasus. Not only does Georgia border Russia, it also has two frozen, unresolved conflicts involving the breakaway territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.

In August 2008, following a large-scale joint military exercise with U.S. troops, the Georgian military mounted a full offensive into South Ossetia, resulting in Russia’s retaliatory intervention. In the resultant clash, Russian forces quickly destroyed the Georgian forces and restored the previous territorial boundaries of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

That same year, Canada led the campaign to admit both Georgia and Ukraine into NATO. Had Canada been successful in that effort, the third world war would have either erupted in 2008 over South Ossetia, or in March 2014 over Russia’s annexation of the Crimea from Ukraine.

Which begs the question: If we already know that the Caucasus is a powder keg that Russia will not back away from, why are the U.S. and Britain sending in soldiers to simply stir the pot?

It is also difficult to chastise the Russians for having their combat aircraft buzz a U.S. warship when you realize that this destroyer was at the westernmost edge of the Baltic Sea, just outside the Russian port of Kaliningrad. One can only imagine what response would be generated by the U.S. military if a Russian warship was patrolling the Gulf of Mexico.

Olga Oliker, a U.S.-based strategic pundit, denounced the “buzzing” of the American ship as “muscle flexing” on the part of the Russians as an attempt to show “they can stand up to the United States.” One can argue that the U.S. is flexing a hell of a lot more muscle by sailing right up to the Russian’s doorstep in this instance.

Then, of course, is the collective failure of memory as to the fact that, since the end of the Cold War in 1990, NATO has repeatedly broken its promise not to expand eastward. As part of the agreements between Russian President Mikhail Gorbachev and U.S. President Ronald Reagan, NATO said it would not encroach upon what had formerly been the Soviet sphere of influence. In fact, in discussions regarding the reunification of Germany, it was agreed that no non-German (read, no U.S.) military units would be deployed into the former East German Soviet-controlled territory.

However, the minute the Soviet Union collapsed in May 1991, NATO began to eagerly recruit former Warsaw Pact nations into the alliance. If you include the fact that NATO backed the anti-Russian rebellion in Ukraine in 2014 and continues to provide support and training to the Ukrainian military, NATO has effectively pushed right up against Russia’s frontier — from the Baltic in the north through Poland and Ukraine, all the way to Georgia in the south.

A more apt name for NATO’s ongoing Operation Reassurance deployments might in fact be Operation Provocation.

1 Comment
VIARail NEW.gif
twitter instagram youtube yelp tumblr pinterest reddit linkedin flickr facebook
  • Events
  • Digital Access
  • Contact
  • Commandos

espritdecorps

canadian military magazine

Esprit de Corps is a Canadian military magazine covering issues related to Army, Navy, Air Force, national defence, security and foreign policy. We also publish Canadian military history pieces and veterans news.

1066 Somerset St. West | , Ottawa, ON K1Y 4T3

twitter instagram youtube yelp tumblr pinterest reddit linkedin flickr facebook